AI
Wednesday, July 19, 2023 3:02:42 PM
You are suggesting that we and the FDA should care about comments on the publication, but we should not care about the independent peer review of the clinical study?? That seems “dubious” to me.
This also seems dubious:
Before November 22, we saw a lot of posts about the great value of independent peer review—posts such as these:
After November, we saw a lot of posts about peer reviewers being deceived, or posts that imply that the peer reviewers weren’t part of the process at all:
Believe carefully. This is the greatest and most powerful lesson that I have learned since arriving on Earth. Examine what you believe about yourself most importantly, and then believe carefully as you interact with the world.
Recent NWBO News
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM
