The dates are meaningful in this case, because his filing 2 weeks earlier shows that he had already met 2 of the 3 parts of the Cease and Desist order. The 3rd is somewhat unclear in it's reference to Fraud. It doesn't detail the fraud. That raises the question of IF that order might be vacated, as Mr. Hot Dog says he has asked it to be. It has been stated that this had nothing to do with REG D, in fact he filed for and was seemingly granted a REG D exemption (REGDEX). That exemption is limited permission to sell unregistered securities. They might still have him on public solicitation to sell........I don't know.
Another reason I am all over her about her "facts" is that if she is correct about "toxic financing" being shareholder approved, then they "robbed" within the law. IF she is wrong about the "toxic financing", we should be looking for where the money REALLY went.
I think we need to keep digging, not just accept her explination of where the money went.
Sorry to be so long-winded, but a short answer could not be clear about some details.
Don't bait the bear........
