InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 962
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2018

Re: ChuckBits post# 6226

Wednesday, 07/12/2023 5:52:47 PM

Wednesday, July 12, 2023 5:52:47 PM

Post# of 6249
ChuckBits, I laughed when I read your comment, pointing out my bone-headed inaccuracy regarding HIVEs ath.

While I didn't like the reverse split, I was in favor of it at the time due to the ugly market circumstances. HIVE needed to keep their head above water and a dollar.

Now, getting SP to $28.75 will take some time. If they succeed, perhaps it will someday make sense to reverse the reverse split.

HIVE entered the US market from Canada with too many shares, at least compared to some newer miners which had 40 to 80 million. HIVE had way more, over 400 million, if memory serves. This might have allowed them to be one of the most liquid and active trading stocks on the Toronto exchange, but it was poison to the OTC, then Nasdaq. I think Frank Holmes made a mistake, thinking, or assuming, that HIVE would maintain such activity when they reached the US market. When this didn't happen, it left HIVE fat and unappetizing to the institutional gorillas. That honor went to MARA and RIOT, with HIVE left to reinvent itself in the brave new world.

Having so many shares made HIVE a difficult and/or confusing company. In my opinion, they misread the American market and should have done the reverse split before they reached the US shores and Nasdaq. Had they gotten here with 60 million, instead of 400 million, things might have unfolded differently.

But that's all assumption vapor. A waste of typing with my thumbs.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y