Well, what do you expect when you dont read the content and want to be spoon fed relevance. Opinions on CRGP become short sighted and easily identified as simple minded or have a lack of critical thinking skills, especially when it comes to important matters relating to trading practices regarding market mechanics.
I still own every share I bought because there is a settlement issue with CRGP and believe it will have to be rectified. Many court cases are addressing this concern because it requires the attention of the courts from a broader perspective.
In order for this settlement issue to be resolved, it would require a counting/audit of shares which addresses the share imbalance (identified in Nebraska Cor Clearing v CRGP case) and the market mechanics of essential participants to enforce it(Issuer/TA/Regulator). It also requires regulatory oversight or corrective actions via the processing of a corporate action. This is very logical. CRGP still trades because their is still value here. And not for nothing, the Nevada State Court would have never overturned and corrected custodianship if fraud on the court was not presented by a well respected and reputable law firm.
This is my position. It has always been my position. I shouldn't have to be harassed, insulted, or recieve defamation for it.
So again, the market mechanics...Who registered, issued, authorized, and/or cleared the shares to trade?
The settlement of trades has always been the issue and requires a resolution.
If you don't believe that then please move onto other matters.
$13
$CRGP
