InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1087
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/13/2017

Re: art2426 post# 317632

Wednesday, 07/05/2023 7:45:39 PM

Wednesday, July 05, 2023 7:45:39 PM

Post# of 333453
“I respectfully agree to disagree with that.”

Ok, I get that you think that BIEL’s past failures would be significantly relevant to any prospective suitor(s). Correct if I am wrong.

Let’s me guess…as a result of BIEL’s “failures”

…perhaps that’s the angle to pick them up for peanuts?

…or perhaps…totally steer clear of the “mess” called BIEL?

Clue:
Every single company in the Pain Arena worth their salt knows about BIEL’s past, as do all the rest of the companies working in the pain field. All of them. All of it. Soup to nuts. And all about each other!

All of these companies and potential suitors have specific personnel doing the analysis, namely, SWOT Analysis, and also retain the services of external professional resources that do this monitoring for a living, and more. No stone is left unturned and all competitors of means monitor each other constantly.

There is NO company on this earth that would turn down the chance to align with BIEL if there is ANY hint that this NOPAIN Act and CMS insurance reimbursement can show them the big money…past be damned.

If you were the biggie prospective suitor and BIEL could show you the big money, and “worse”, your competition wants in too, which would eat dearly into your profits if they get it, BIEL’s “past” would block your purchase?

Defies logic imo. Yes, we agree to disagree.

Each potential “biggie” knows that all the other biggies know what they know. One smells big money, they all smell big money.

Supply and demand.

The demand to align with BIEL in whatever way via an approach by one or multiple suitors, and given the NOPAIN Act/CMS insurance in tandem, remains to be seen.

All imo