The reason talks are so "far fetched" is because of the defamation of character, slander, and libelous statements Greg Halpern made on the Hoodwinkers website. The same character assassinations on his new website. Posts on the chat boards. Illegally recorded phone calls. Lawsuits. Threats. Extortion phone calls, and more. Why would Harvey Vechery, or any legitimate businessman for that matter, have anything to do with a man with no morals, ethics, or values? Most people don’t associate with someone who has abused the relationship and taken advantage of them financially. Greg Halpern has cost Harvey Vechery over $8 million dollars, which is reason enough to not talk to him. The idea that Greg Halpern is the only one who can get Vechery his money back is delusional.
The people who invested in MAXD did not invest based in a patent troll and pump and dump format. I would say most of them invested based on the technology. I’ve read the filings. “Everything was fine and dandy when the PPS headed north.” That’s the problem right there. A typical example of symbolism over substance. Halpern only cared about getting the PPS up temporarily for the sole benefit of himself and his close associates. That is not building a company, it is selling the sizzle with no steak behind it. The only people who made out in those years were the ones being told when to buy and sell.
I do care, and I have checked the filings. Especially the fantastical 8-K, which anyone can go back and read the analysis to see how distorted it is. When the statement is made, “those deals and mentions were all Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern, with bad actor's.... Read the filings!!!!,” it is nothing more than an attempt to trick shareholders into believing there are filings showing it is the fault of “bad actors” instead of Greg Halpern. Again, point that bony finger and blame everyone else for Halpern’s own mistakes.
One last thing, the assumption is that readers and shareholders have short memories, and that’s not true. Attempting to resurrect the “John Blaisure was in control” nonsense again is not going to work. Greg Halpern was always in control of everything at MAXD. He kept Blaisure “behind the Chinese wall” so he would not know how Halpern was siphoning off money for his own needs, including using the corporate debit card. That was how Google pierced the corporate veil and got the judgment. Do we really need to rehash this old news? Do I need to post all the Blaisure information again to prove Halpern wrong once again? More than happy to. All if have to do is, wait for it, copy and paste!
AI
