“Just Harvey Vechery making a call and complaining to a few non legitimate shareholders, so we can get verbiage posted against a former CEO....” What makes one shareholder legitimate and another illegitimate? Halpern has been claiming some of us are illegitimate for some time now so we should know how he arrived at this conclusion.
“Lawsuits from legitimate MAXD shareholders and most likely Greg Halpern!!!!” Once again, how does Halpern decide who is in which category? These are some examples of past “deals” Halpern has been involved in during his time at MAXD:
For instance, if someone is contracted to write an article favorable to the company, and is compensated with shares in that company for that service, would that classify him as legitimate, as he was performing a service? Or would he be illegitimate because he didn’t buy the shares on the open market?
If a toxic lender accepts a note, backed up by shares in the company, and the company defaults on that note, resulting in the lender taking the shares and selling them on the open market, no matter what the current share price and how that sale might impact the company, how would that toxic lender be classified?
If an officer of a company sells two million of his own shares to a lender and accepts cash in return for his own personal reasons. Is that buyer an illegitimate shareholder because he bought off market shares direct from the company officer?
If a subcontractor performed a service for the company, and then accepted shares in lieu of cash, would that make him legitimate, or would he also be called illegitimate by Halpern?
How about a mining company that agrees to accept a large block of shares as part of the deal, even though the deal never happened, would they have been illegitimate?
If a musical performer agreed to promote the company in exchange for shares, even though the deal fell apart, how would he have been classified?
How about someone who agrees to post on a chat board, on the company’s behalf, in exchange for shares. I’m sure, in the eyes of Greg Halpern, that would definitely classify them as being legitimate.
Let’s be honest. Halpern is categorizing anyone who goes against the regime narrative and talking points as being illegitimate. Anyone who points out his deceptions, defamations, and wild claims is on the list. I’m sure there are shareholders in every company who may be classified as “illegitimate,” including MAXD, but the people he is targeting in his comments are not in that category.
AI
