Grudgingly, I agree with J Galt, as quoted below:
"Yes, the Vechery clock Is ticking. Three business days now. Just like Halpern’s has been for 14 years. How many times does the number three go into fourteen?
The fact that MAFIP is making money for their clients is irrelevant to MAXD shareholders, at this point in time, and is nothing more than a litigation strategy. MAXD is not making real money in any area and never has. Would MAFIP have made money for MAXD? We don’t know that and, apparently, never will. Since there were no LOI’s, no contracts, and no official PRs on accepted sites, there was no deal. If there were truly a business opportunity for MAXD, Halpern would have found a way to monetize it by going in front of the court or Harvey Vechery."
Three goes into fourteen four times with a remainder of two.
MAFIP has stated that they apparently will not work with the new team, so why bring them up further? I wish them well going forward, be blessed.
Primarily, I would like to see MaxD and whomever the new team is, demonstrate leadership towards their shareholders, particularly their number one shareholder and myself. Second, it would take little to change the intellectual property of the audio, demonstrated as being modified since early 2021, and make payment to the modifier of the IP which is likely the number one shareholder - this is for those have a level of understanding about what it takes to modify source code. Third, is the reported issue with the SEC about HV cleared? As grantastic points out, it certainly doesn't seem like the SEC issue is cleared with JB. Fourth, does the leadership know what to do with what they have been awarded?
Immediately, it seems like MaxD would be better served with the previous leadership in place. As that is not the case, where is the leadership?
And guard your hypocrisy.
