“Defamation?” That’s rich. Like on the Hoodwinkers website? The same site the judge reviewed before dropping the hammer on Halpern? There’s many examples of libel, slander, and defamation of character on that site alone.
“All posts about forensic science auditing, which was done during 7 11 BK.” There’s a huge difference between the accounting process conducted during the personal bankruptcy and what has been referred to on this site. Huge. Personal vs a public company forensic audit. Halpern knows what we’re referring to.
“all SEC filings associated with MAX Sound; Nothing there!!!!” Not true. The legal team is aware of what is “there,” as well as what is not there. Once again, Halpern knows what we’re referring to, “good books” or not.
“Throwing adjectives out there like Sunday brunch....” This is hardly worth mentioning but I think it shows the pettiness of the poster. Why was it a problem mentioning I was at Sunday brunch with my family? I was simply saying that I was late in reading and responding to the posts on the boards and that was why. It’s just more irrelevant condescension from the poster. “Lol.” Please stick with facts to counter my arguments.
“Anyways; sounds worse being duped out of$120K, right, and the amount that GH lost too....” It was a legitimate and simple contract between Connie Nash and the MD1941 group. There were no hidden “poison pills” as with the Halpern Nash contract. Nash breached the contract and the MD1941 group lost $120k. They now have a large judgment against Nash as well as a bench warrant. The bitterness of Nash over the way she was treated by Halpern, and the “hidden poison pill” in the contract, which allowed Halpern to weasel out of the payments, was carried over to her relationship with the group and more than likely caused the breach. This has nothing to do with the MAXD shareholders as they were not a party to the agreement, nor the loss. Halpern, on the other hand, didn’t pay Nash according to the contract and the rest is known history. MAXD not only lost the $530k paid to Nash, but they also got into a prolonged lawsuit with Google and lost at every turn so the financial losses were much greater for the shareholders than the $120k that’s repetitively mentioned. Continuing to bring this up as an apparent insult to MD1941 is a strange way to build your legal case. “Lol.”
The board poster apparently doesn’t understand how the system works. The judge awarded “relief” on April 28th, but the legal team had to wait until the final order was published to safely move forward in any area. The final order was published last Thursday before 5PM and needed to be reviewed. Once again, it’s comical, not to mention transparent, that the poster continues to believe 14 years of Zen nothingness is comparable to three business days of legal review. Mind numbingly incoherent legal strategy. “Lol.” [/b
“It will be interesting for years everyone posted there was no product.... Now HV takes over and he's going to swoop down and save the company....” The product Lloyd Trammell invented has been stagnant for years. It takes real engineers to develop and modify technology, not imaginary code writers like Halpern. Greg Halpern chose to use Harvey’s money to enrich himself instead of paying the engineers, so the product has not been improved. As to “swooping down,” to my knowledge, Harvey Vechery has never claimed to be a superhero, but he might just turn out to be the “avenging angel.” As in angel investor.
“The Harvey Vechery agenda was setup two years ago, but blindness shutout Japan 100percent, now it will hurt MAXD shareholders long-term, for a long long time....” Where does this information come from? Tel the handler his dates are off. Vechery was a big-time supporter of Halpern all the way through the bankruptcy. It was only then that Vechery decided he could no longer ignore the lies, deceptions, and fake deals, not to mention the millions loaned to Halpern personally. Evidence came out about Halpern, and he lost the support of his angel investor. The personal chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed in April of 2020. It was moved by the court to chapter 7 in February of 2021 before being released in January of 2023. Vechery didn’t file suit until May of 2022 yet had continued to support him up until that time. Facts are facts and words have meaning. Therefore, there was no agenda prior to the filing of the suit, and that agenda was to stop the bleeding of the Halpern years.
The strategy of claiming the Japan deal would have saved the shareholders will not work. Claiming it will be eons before MAXD shareholders receive any kind of a return my be part of Halperns’ legal strategy, but it’s fairly transparent.
As to the “direction of the company” and “where’s the PR????” I imagine that the required information will be officially posted as soon as the legal team is finished with the remaining legal questions. This is nothing more than an attempt to rile up the shareholder base for the imaginary class action suit.
AI
