I’m going to respond to the posted comments in separate sections, each directed toward a specific topic presented in the two separate posts.
The poster stated, “This interference from H. Vechery Trust legal team has seriously jeopardize the Max Sound Corp platform.” Interference? Is that the new legal term the Halpern team is using? The Vechery legal team was not interfering in any business Greg Halpern supposedly had ongoing with Japan or in any other specific area. There was no business to interfere with. Define the interference from his team. Spell it out and I will dissect it. How, when, and in what way did they interfere? Claims, such as this one, shouldn’t be made without evidence backing it up.
What “Max Sound Corp platform? There were no deals in place, no contracts, signed, no money or collateral changing hands, nor profits incoming. No LOI’s on record. No engineering upgrades. No official company PR’s. Only words on chat boards. Only references to the mysterious Rurouni and his “team.” There was no business to interfere with!
Does one consider pursing legal remedies for unpaid loans interference? Is being a non-reporting company relegated to the Expert Markets, downgrading the stock even more in the process, without legal repercussions from the major shareholder, deemed acceptable? And authentic legal action is now apparently classified as “interference.” Is legally responding to unsubstantiated allegations, slander, and libel on a Hoodwinkers website considered interference?
This appears to be nothing more than an attempt to claim interference for the purposes of future litigation by Halpern. As I’ve said in the past, Halpern’s business model doesn’t involve establishing relationships, manufacturing a product, or earning revenue, it’s based on borrowing money and then how much he can gain through litigation. Can’t borrow any more money? Let’s sue somebody! Like every one of his past legal cases, it will fail. You must be able to prove the case in court. With evidence, not baseless accusations. Of course, you would have to hire an attorney and show up to do that.
I’ve already addressed the lunacy of the Nash comparison in a prior post, but I wonder how MAFIP, Tenchi, Shiro, and the far eastern division of the Halpernettes is aware of what really happened back in the Nash/Google days for Shiro to make that comparison?
“This was the perfect storm for the Max Sound Corp Stock.” How so? We’ve had so many financial “perfect storms” over the past 14 years that I wonder how this one was any different? I can hear it now, “the company was set to make quadrillions in the Asian market until Harvey Vechery and his legal team INTERFERED in our master plan, thus costing the shareholders an infinite return on their Unobtainium.” Nice try but I doubt the courts will buy that approach as there is no proof of any deals.
AI
