InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 253
Posts 2747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2006

Re: MF03 post# 11517

Monday, 02/19/2007 7:02:58 PM

Monday, February 19, 2007 7:02:58 PM

Post# of 143139
yep, because of the omission of a material fact about the existence of another assignment of the stonewall note that had already been ruled valid by two prior courts and the improper financial reporting thereof.


Rule 10b-5 -- Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange,
To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,


To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or


To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person,
in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.