InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 2126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2018

Re: frrol post# 415470

Monday, 05/15/2023 3:59:47 PM

Monday, May 15, 2023 3:59:47 PM

Post# of 463379
Since the A273 trial did not measure amyloid SUVr on amyloid PET scans, the CSF and serum biomarkers would need to be considered. The Lecanemab study did measure plasma p-tau181 and found a nice dose-dependent correlation with the PET centiloid change (p=0.037 with a Spearman coefficient but p=0.071 with a more rigid Pearson correlation). Therefore, Anavex would have data from a different company to help support this biomarker.

The CSF biomarker data for lecanemab showed increased Ab1-42 and reduced p-tau with very significant p values, better than plasma (counterintuitively, higher Ab1-42 in CSF is better - retuning towards normal)

https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13195-022-01124-2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053280/figure/Fig5/

These 3 biomarkers would need to be significant, consistent and survive multiplicity standards to allow Anavex to argue their use for AA.

I do not think any other serum/CSF biomarker, besides those above, has enough independent evidence to get through the FDA.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News