InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 45
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/04/2005

Re: Xenophon post# 295

Monday, 02/19/2007 3:58:12 PM

Monday, February 19, 2007 3:58:12 PM

Post# of 842
Sinister and Bolt do go hand in hand don't they?

I have no idea what the cause of death was, but I too would like to know. IMHO, anyone who would lure someone away from a real IND drug that was the only thing that ever worked for their cancer by lying about the manufacturer and the drug just so they could use that person, and others, as free guinea pigs to point out to investors and use in lieu of conducting actual trials - and then callously stand by and let the person die because their cancer returned and continued to grow . . .

. . . anyone who would send fake emails to youth oriented drug forums telling them to go to the home remedy forum because it was a thinly disguised site about a drug that gave you a super high, and all you had to do was mix-it 50/50 with vodka and MAINLINE it (which would likely have been instantly fatal) just to try to strike at and discredit an opponent he attacked and grossly underestimated (wink), who turned around and helped expose Bolt and his schemes to one and all . . .

. . . and anyone with Bolt's known background of schemes involving multiple fake companies with non existent facilities and products that bilked unwitting investors, criminal activities including multiple convictions for impersonating law officers, public slander and attacks on honest citgizens, spurious harassment lawsuits, and avoiding creditors . . .

Yeah, I can see someone like that to do just about anything when it comes to serving their self-interests and greed for ill-gotten money. With characters like that, the whiff of last week's fish is usually telling.

However, the link to ancestors.com (when it works) clearly does show a marriage of a Paul McLouth to a Blanch Bolt.

Regardless of how the last name scenario happened, I am sure that now the Vandergrachts hold their noted in-law in highest regard, just as the Bolt family itself must surely be proud to have such a noteworthy legacy attached to their family name.

Just wondering, but do you suppose that now the 25% ownership in Scammoda which was, at one time anyway, in the name of the "Vandergracht Family Trust" will now revert to Bolt? If so, it might be worth enough to buy him an extra set of paper slippers that might come in handy soon. Better still, maybe it will even stretch far enough for some Preparation H . . .


"The government has aptly described this business as being an enterprise which included a group of imaginary products and services, located in various imaginary locations ..." USA vs Jim Bolt, 1985

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.