InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 363
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2023

Re: chipboarder post# 229385

Saturday, 05/06/2023 6:37:45 PM

Saturday, May 06, 2023 6:37:45 PM

Post# of 232828
I appreciate and respect your opinion . I also appreciate the dialogue on the subject of APPL and LQMT.
The Tesla approach is a questionable LQMT Nasdaq strategy because of the other APPLE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM aka AAPL PROJECT TITAN EV . That’s the reason I believe the Tesla LQMT strategy is not a Nasdaq point.
Public knowledge the AAPL PROJECT TITAN EV is a NDA RUMOR for the EV future use of Automotive Products containing BMG mass production.
APPLE has a stranglehold on LQMT USA for the trademark, brand name and manufacturing of more things than CE.
Defense of the trademark and brand is an Apple obligation to the 2010 agreements. If APPLE was to disconnect from the agreements today LQMT WOULD BE SWEPT UP BY A WHALE WITHIN HOURS. AND You are right about the AAPL/LQMT USA situation being complex . CIP between AAPL/LQMT needs to be re-addressed but the CONTINUATION OF THE NDA between AAPL/LQMT won’t allow it. Li and TC should address this question immediately for the LQMT shareholders today.
They won’t. Why? There’s more to the no volume 0.06s range discouraging trading LQMT. The reason is a good reason for LONG shareholders but it seems to have a lot to do with AAPL and the future and not the lack of. Tesla might use LQMT under nda but they won’t be the reason LI and TC take LQMTUSA back to the Nasdaq…… North of 80? Wisdom .
I’m north of 62 and I respect your opinion of LQMT. Thanks again for the dialogue and replies.
GL and enjoy your weekend.
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News