Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

The Halpernettes continue to use the word “misinformation” to describe anything they disagree with or contradicts their agenda. If the comments made about the April 28th hearing are truly to be classified as misinformation, then how does one explain this publicly posted information by the court: “The Court determines that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought. The Court signs the proposed judgment.” Those words not only carry weight, but they also have a specific meaning. They are also the Court’s words, posted publicly for anyone to read.

As has been stated, the defendant (Halpern) has the right to file a motion to reconsider and if the rules are followed, the Court will then consider that motion. As of this morning, there is no posted information on the public site indicating any additional filings. Nothing about Halpern hiring an attorney and being assigned to the case. Nothing about any motions to reconsider being filed.

As to the comments made by the board poster, who is now being mocked on this site, he is expressing his opinions, as his accuser is, and both have a right to do so. As to whether this is “a losing battle,” time will tell. My opinion on this case is already known. The bottom line is the Haplernettes believe it is a no brainer for the judge to accept Halpern’s version of the truth, therefore negating all the facts presented and already agreed upon by the judge. I’m not so sure that will happen.