Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

“An error in fact or law material to the decision.” My understanding is the “facts” presented to the judge were all taken from words posted on social media, in filings, documents, electronic correspondence, and by Greg Halpern on his Hoodwiinkers and other websites. In other words, using Greg Halpern’s own words against him in court. Were Halpern’s own words “errors in fact?” Considering the source, that is entirely possible. Therefore, Judge Taylor has already been introduced to the “real facts” and based his decision on said information. Beluga cars, gold mining, $100m by year end, 50 deals in 50 days, etc. All written words from Halpern.

Halpern should have been at each of the two hearings if he wanted to present his version of the facts, but neither Halpern nor his attorney made an appearance or submitted any evidence. The attendance of Halpern in court or by Zoom would require being sworn in and testifying under oath, which could be quite problematic for Greg when key questions are asked and an honest response is required, and then becomes part of the legal record. I assume that’s why he never appears in court.

Talking about “disbarment” for the plaintiff’s attorneys is pretty humorous. I think Judge Taylor would be happy with the plaintiff’s legal team because THEY SHOWED UP IN COURT! At least they had enough respect for the court to show up and litigate the "real facts." If they were allowed to cross examine Halpern in court, the proper phrase would be “legal dismemberment,” not disbarment.