InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,185.20
(
-0.41%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
-0.66%
)
Bitcoin
60,202.97
(
-2.28%
)
Post# of 145296
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

MadScholar1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 6
Posts 61
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2022

MadScholar1

Re: toncatmad post# 133998

Wednesday, 04/26/2023 3:28:28 PM

Wednesday, April 26, 2023 3:28:28 PM

Post# of 145296
Sir, apropos your statement, " ... none of that has anything even remotely to do with or about BioAmber," whether this is True or False depends on 1) Who the parties are, and 2) What the "Parties' Settlement Agreement" stipulated. What's the answer to these two questions?

It's probably significant that the "Parties" request the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California to retain jurisdiction over the Parties. Now why do you think that is?

Enlighten us, if you can.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up