Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Joseph_K]

So does basparks79 and all who Liked that post count as WGT? Boi568 said he was not WGT, and as a relative newbie I admit I may not get the context. But to me, this is pure WGT:

Missling didn't create this situation; it was the collusive manipulators with all its FUDsters (and AF) who created the fake narrative. ...
The only mean score not shown was ADCS-ADL; however, with an Odds Ratio greater than that of Cog, would suggest that it too is impressive and met endpoints... as the company continues to stand by.

I like a lot of what Missling has done, but claiming "collusive manipulators" are the sole problem is ridiculous. ADCS-ADL was a primary endpoint. It's not impossible, but working from the belief that its respective mean score difference is "impressive" based on an Odds Ratio that doesn't say how many patients were above the threshold is wishful thinking. If the mean score difference (or n for the ADCS-ADL Odds Ratio) is so impressive, why would it be omitted? The "FUDsters" did not create this issue: It is a glaring omission, and Anavex (Missling) handed it to them. After four months the omission has not been corrected; whose fault is that?

Maybe in the long run there will be a positive, plausible explanation for having omitted it, but that shoddy bit of statistics (or Anavex's shoddy reporting of the stats) is why, in the short run, the share price is so low. Stockholders sold because of it. So Missling or (man, I hope not!) actually inadequate AD trial results is why, or most of why, the share price currently sits where it is. If Anavex had provided the clear, complete data serious investors expect in a TLR, and that data was as good as basparks believes it is, the share price would be much higher, Feuerstein et al be damned.