InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3502
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/11/2022

Re: I-Glow post# 63621

Thursday, 04/20/2023 3:02:15 PM

Thursday, April 20, 2023 3:02:15 PM

Post# of 69158

Sharp lost two custodianships because of failure to serve/notify all parities involved.

Then for GOFF/WNFT Sharp told the court the case needed to be expedited because he had a merger lined up - but this was to circumvent the system and not properly serve/notify all parties such as Calasse.



That is what it seems to be, at this point. Exploiting a loophole in order to circumvent the system and speed up the process without properly notifying the shareholders.

I am not sure we will ever know if he had a merger lined up or not. But logically, if he did, he would have handled everything differently as time is money for a company looking to do a reverse merger.

How can there be so much that you don't know
You don't know