InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 222
Posts 13853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2011

Re: shajandr post# 96518

Tuesday, 04/04/2023 11:11:01 AM

Tuesday, April 04, 2023 11:11:01 AM

Post# of 96901
The CONTENT of your post about UOIP patent ownership is irrelevant to the UOIP infringement lawsuit and therefore worthless to UOIP shareholders. Here is why.

1. The ownership of the UOIP patents that are expired did NOT need to exchange hands after UOIP launched its infringement lawsuit against the 13 companies and successfully forced COX to settle in the first trial of the 13. ...Why?

2. As COX trial settlement clearly showed us, the lawsuit was about the valuation of the INFRINGEMENT of the UOIP patents IN THE PAST. We read extensively about the valuation ranges on this board.

3. COX trial was the first of the 13 companies that were mentioned in UOIP Infringement lawsuit. COX trial ended abruptly in the second day of the trial in which UOIP was awarded $125 million dollars. THE $125 million was the result of the COX trial settlement! It had nothing to do with the settlement of ALL 13 companies

4. The trial of the other 12 companies also abruptly stopped. So, UOIP shareholders do not know the status of the UOIP settlement with the other 12 companies YET.

5. The Judge just allowed UOIP shareholders' legal team to have access to ALL documents in the case.

6. What happened to the status of the settlement with the other 12 defendants? We will find out soon!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.