ACTUALLY, it said that in the opinion of the writer, "Our opinion: in the next decade, we will have quantum computers that are significantly better than super computers today, BUT THEY MOST LIKELY WON'T BE IN MASS USE by governments and companies until the 2030s. Eventually toward the end of the 2030s and early 2040s they'll shrink down to a size and cost viable for consumer use. Quantum computing will be more relevant to certain businesses where highly complex algorithms need to be evaluated which in a normal computer would take days, weeks, months or even years."
Note that he/she does NOT assume that Quantum will be a household device until THE END OF THE 2030s AND EARLY 2040s.
THEREFORE, the point SHOULD BE OBVIOUS to anyone that the world will need WORLDCLASS cybersecurity for BOTH technologies for the next 7--27 YEARS. Therefore, to make the argument that VP is no longer necessary just because the world is SLOWLY moving toward Quantum is TOTAL NONSENSE. It makes as much sense as saying that because there will EVENTUALLY be no need for firewalls, antivirus, and other cyber products, Norton, McAfee, Crowdstrike, and other such companies should all be out of business because no one needs them anymore,
To make the argument that there is now no longer any need for the current approaches to cybersecurity makes as much sense as arguing that there was no longer a need for blacksmiths because the world's first steam-powered vehicle was invented in 1672.
NONSENSE!!!
MAINSTREAM QUANTUM IS COMING, but until it arrives the world will STILL NEED VALIDIAN PROTECT!!!
And, since VP is the cybersecurity product of the FUTURE, I fully expect to learn that part of the current delay in VP news is because it now protects the early generations of Quantum.
JMHO
TPP
Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes. (Proverbs 26:5)
