The Rising Influence of Rising Affluence

[semi_infinite]

BARD/GPT - comparison 1/3 reviewed by Michael Grossman, one of the co-originators in the field. https://sites.google.com/site/nonnewtoniancalculus/Home

>>>>>>
My detailed critique would probably turn out to be too long and too boring. But both of the bots’ answers to your question need lots of revision. Readers will be confused.

I think at least some of that confusion is caused by the following three expressions, which should always be carefully explained before being used.

a) The expression “geometric calculus”:

In our work that expression refers to one of our non-Newtonian calculi. But some people use that expression in a different way.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22geometric+calculus%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari#ip=1



b) The expression “non-Newtonian fluids”:

People unfamiliar with our non-Newtonian calculus often wrongly guess that expression is related to our non-Newtonian calculus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22non-Newtonian+fluid%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari



c) The expression “non-Newtonian calculus”:

People unfamiliar with our work often assume that expression simply means any calculus different from the classical calculus of Newton and Leibniz. For example, fractional calculus, nonstandard calculus, stochastic calculus, lambda calculus.

>>>>>>>
The foundational ideas of Grossman and Katz has spawned additional methods. eg. https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/28/2/28