Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

Not a surprising conclusion. In fact, it explains a lot. Why else would people like Dr.M. avoid the established system when he is holding a full CNS house. IMO, b/c he knew the game is rigged/stacked/corrupt. This is also consistent w/last few years of FDA open corruption and dysfunction.

Maybe now we can all move on.

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/peer-review


These magazines are real businesses, so necessarily sensitive to advertising revenues and "reprints" granted by Big Pharma!

And as if this were not reason enough to be suspicious, you should know that the main shareholders of Elsevier are also the main shareholders... of Big Pharma!
For example, BlackRock, to name but one, is the number 1 shareholder of RELX Group, and one of the top 10 shareholders of... Pfizer.
It's even worse than that, because the number 1 shareholder of Pfizer is Vanguard Group... who is himself the main shareholder of BlackRock!
In short, these are the same players (and probably the same people) who own the leading medical journals AND the major pharmaceutical multinationals.

- Dr. AS Relman, professor of medicine at Harvard:
“The medical profession is being bought off by the drug and vaccine industry, not only at the level of medical practice but also at the level of teaching and research. Academic institutions in this country (USA) have indulged in becoming paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I find that hideous.”
- Dr M Angell, physician, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe the essential clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of reference doctors or to authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in making this observation, which I came to slowly and reluctantly over two decades as editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”
- Dr R Horton, editor of The Lancet:
“A scandalous number of published studies are unreliable at best, when they are not completely misleading, in addition to fraudulent. Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”