Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR)

[microcapbiotech]

A question WAS ASKED. "Why'd they reverse split then?"
An answer WAS GIVEN. "To keep from being delisted by Nasday, it's obvious."
Your Response. "WRONG!"
FIRST, using logical thought processes, EXPLAIN why EXACTLY the answer is WRONG, when everybody has been discussing here for almost 2 years now that they would have to do a reverse split to stay above $1 a share.
THEN, I must ask, WHY do you include "At this point with no news it's right back to under $1. Whether $7 million or $17M there's basically no market cap now by any biotech measure."
NONE of that has anything to do with the asked question and given answer.
What is it's relevance to the question and answer? NONE.
So why use it as some twisted attempt to prove a point that is obviously incorrect?
Just to continue to be antagonistic for some needed reason?