InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 1840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2017

Re: Harley16 post# 289536

Monday, 03/06/2023 11:20:54 AM

Monday, March 06, 2023 11:20:54 AM

Post# of 347554
The returns only mean that they can not be argued as a current reason for lack of transparency. But yes, the length of time here is a big deal. If DBMM was a threat to investors, then the time involved here is unacceptable. There is also a provision within the rules that SEC has to prove that DBMM is a greater threat to future investors, so therefore, it can sacrifice existing investors thru revocation to save any future harm.
This is now difficult to prove. Obviously, SEC can do what it wants, but once this sees a higher authority, it would likely be dismissed, same as ALJ did. A lot of conjecture since SEC has the control, but time will tell.