InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 938
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2002

Re: sgolds post# 16938

Friday, 11/07/2003 3:00:25 PM

Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00:25 PM

Post# of 97749
OK, if K8/256K has approx same die size as K7, basing Paris on K8 makes sense. (I was under the impression that K8/256K would be larger than K7/512K.) It will have the cost saving of on-die memory controller, good for the value market and better performance per MHz to boot.

Here's what DOESN'T make sense -- eliminating AMD64 compatibility.

The socket supports it, no problem there.

Removing 64-bit capability would not same enough die space to be worth the headache. The 64-bit capability does not "slow down" the chip when running 32-bit Windows. Even if these low-end chips are never connected to more than two 512M DIMMs, by then there will be 64-bit-enabled games, video editing applications, encryption/decryption apps etc for Windows XP 64 that will just run a lot slower in 32-bit mode.

People will buy 64-bit PCs not because they want 4G of RAM, but because it will run their applications faster.

Petz
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News