Enzolytics Inc (ENZC)

[MAGA_PATRIOT]

Foxi - I partially agree with your quote below, but the main reason that I question it and believe otherwise is as follows:

1. the length of time that this has been going on. This is the OTC (and pinks at that), and we all know this goes on daily, but to maintain this pattern for as long as they have is well outside the norm. They would usually do this, make some $, and move on. Especially when factoring in my next point (#2 below), but that's not what's happened here. Instead, this has continued for almost 2 full years, and we have been devalued every step along the way. Big name partners + Collaborators = Devalued/taken down. Test Results show same efficacy + 20X less toxic than industry gold standard = Devalued/taken down. Patent publication = devalued/taken down. 2yr Audit = Devalued/taken down.

2. Lack of volume. There's gotta be 10's of thousands of other tickers out there, which are much more suited to the type of trading/games you've described. Much higher avg daily volume, bigger float, etc...., yet they stick with ENZC

3. PUMA - They are known for exactly what they're doing. I am 100% convinced that they are doing so at the direction of a client and not just "market-making" and/or "algo-trading" for micro-profits, as you called them. PUMA is NOT retail, and they have been in full control of this ticker since October 2022, the majority of the time leading both bid/ask. Based on our lack of volume & bid support, PUMA has already accumulated more than enough shares to drive this wherever they want, whenever they want. The way that I've watched their algos is work is by controlling the ask to hold it and drive it closer to their bid. In the event that their ask begins getting hit more than they want, they back off, but only until the buying stops/slows. The buying usually stops pretty quick because of the current lack of retail buying interest, so then PUMA immediately drop the ask again.

Volume/buying pressure is the only way we break free, which is why I keep saying that won't happen until PUMA is finished and/or until we're 1-5 days prior to Charles actually dropping something tangible/major. Without something major from Charles, we just don't/won't have the volume to combat them.

4. This pattern really took shape in January 2022, with the VIRT+OTCX tagteam. Somebody needed this under .10 for some reason, but we just don't know who or why. I'm not sure if you were watching back then (they drove us from .16 to under .10, then disappeared completely, but did so without actually buying/selling). Instead, they used their algos to drop the ask and lower the bid every chance they got when buying slowed/stopped, then when buying picked up, they both bowed out at exactly the same milisecond. When it stopped again, they reappeared at the exact same millisecond. They did this for almost a full week until safely under .10 with some padding. A few days afterwards, we creeped back up to .10, at which point they immediately re-appeared together at the exact same second, ran their synced up algos, and drove us safely back under .10. That was the last time we saw .10 or higher. Since then, we've been stuck in the pattern that I laid out in prior post.

Here's a few other items that feed my assumptions/speculation.....

- Charles sitting on SEC Reporting for a reason, and it's not NDA's. To the best of my knowledge, any info protected by NDA would remain protected regardless of SEC Reporting vs Alternative.
- Way past the time frame for IND that should've been filed.
- PPS manipulation/control has gone completely unaddressed by Charles & Co. As we've seen with other OTC CEO's, there are some inexpensive solutions to combat it (ShareIntel, etc...), but for some reason ENZC won't address it. Why? Like I've mentioned many times, I believe PUMA's client is directly connected to ENZC (undisclosed partner, ENZC themselves, etc...)
- Stocks are NOT devalued with every piece of good news, progress, etc... for 2 years straight. This is not organic, nor is normal.

Anyway, I hear & understand what you're saying, and there's easily a chance that I'm wrong with my thoughts/speculation. I'm not suggesting that my speculation is correct beyond a shadow of a doubt, but it is how I Personally feel about what we've been watching. I'm not sure that we'll ever know the full truth behind all of it, but I'm hoping much of it becomes more clear sooner vs later.....

Almost time to see what this week brings. If the pattern is to continue, I'd expect them to drive us back under .045 and either hold us in the same .04-.045 channel we spent weeks in, or drive us further down into the 03s and create new lower holding-channel. If we're to actually break free from the pattern, we still need to move up and break above 079, which with our avg volume, is going to prove tough at best. We shall see soon enough....

The pattern you described with JANE and PUMA looks like market manipulation. For those who can short sell, it seems it'd be profitable to ride this down to the bottom. MMs could use algos to sell at optimal moments, ladder their sells, and cover intraday to minimize risk (if so, that behavior might show up in short volume and not short interest). Those micro-profits might be a motive for driving this down, not MMs knowing insider info or working trades on behalf of the company.