According to PACER, the case was closed on 6/3/2021.
From 4/21/2022 there were many Certificate of Service issued to various entities up to 5/10/2022.
Then there is nothing. As you can see the last Certificate included Goldman Sachs.
Prior certificates were sent to others such as Chase Securities.
I can not find anything else.
Goldman Sachs & Company
200 West Street
New York, NY 10282
And, in like manner notifying the Defendant/Judgment Debtor at these
addresses:
Madero Holding, S.A. de C.V.
Hangar 1,2 y 6
Zona C, AICM
Mexico DF MX 15620
and
Madero Holding, S.A. de C.V.
Calle Buffon 46
Piso 10 Colonia Anzures
Mexico DF MX 11590
04/21/2022 47 NOTICE by UnderSea Recovery Corporation Certificate of Service (English, Donald) (Entered: 04/21/2022)
04/21/2022 48 NOTICE by UnderSea Recovery Corporation Certificate of Service (English, Donald) (Entered: 04/21/2022)
04/21/2022 49 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Deutsche Bank Securities by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 04/21/2022)
04/21/2022 50 NOTICE by UnderSea Recovery Corporation Post Judgment Certificate of Service (English, Donald) (Entered: 04/21/2022)
04/21/2022 51 NOTICE by UnderSea Recovery Corporation Post Judgment Certificate of Discovery (English, Donald) (Entered: 04/21/2022)
05/10/2022 52 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
05/10/2022 53 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
05/10/2022 54 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
05/10/2022 55 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
05/10/2022 56 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
05/10/2022 57 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Post Judgment Discovery by UnderSea Recovery Corporation.(English, Donald) (Entered: 05/10/2022)
And finally I believe under Mexican law they would have had to have a Mexican based lawyer yo handle the judgement.
Mexican law is extremely formalistic as regards the service of summons. It is therefore imperative to engage local counsel when serving summons on the defendant in the foreign proceeding.
Public policy is another tricky issue that must be addressed. When foreign cases take place, and it's foreseen that recognition and enforcement of the award will likely be in Mexico, local counsel should be engaged to review and analyse the merits of the case and its role with regard to Mexican public policy.
https://www.mondaq.com/mexico/litigation-mediation--arbitration/923292/enforcement-of-foreign-judgments-comparative-guide
