Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

Wrong.

The company was NOT MAKING ANY PROFIT. Asher wanted MONEY, not the company.

The Judge in the matter was SICK of DBMM stonewalling the ruling to pay back Asher, so he changed the ruling to give Asher the company. THAT was the PR that Asher put out.

Had ZERO TO DO with "wanting" the company. THAT is a fallacy put out by DBMM management. They tossed it out there and hungry DBMM bagholders lapped up the kool-aid.

The JUDGE was the one who took it upon himself to JAB DBMM with additional measures to get payment for the winning litigant (ASHER), since DBMM was refusing to pay the damages set forth in the ruling. I don't believe for a MINUTE that Asher had anything to do with wanting ownership of a nearly insolvent company that couldn't make it in its chosen field.