Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

Is the SCOTUS request that unreasonable

Sounds like they want a POTUS statement - anywhere kept -- of that intent

Sounds like they do not give weight to a letter post Presidency (which I agree with them)

The best argument seems to be ------ "left with two years we could not finish what would need four years" (my quotes). Interesting argument ---- and the one that seems most powerful if it can be proved that were serious motion for two years but it was not enough"

Overall - this was a taking - and all sub-issues aside and all legal mumbo jumbo aside - the GOV (multiple administrations) took our property - took it - and did not pay us for it -- and somehow that should be arguable without roadblocks and circles and nonsense