Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

According to the federal district court Judge, he thinks that the POTUS was suppose to make a contemporaneous public statement that he thought he couldn't fire Mel Watt, but that's not what the SCOTUS said.

Whether or not the POTUS had internal discussions with his staff about that issue is only known by the federal government and they have consistently hid behind the Executive Privilege and National Security exemptions to Discovery during the years long litigation.

David Thompson is simply asking the court to get to the facts and they remain hidden and unattainable from our government.

The SCOTUS said that the shareholders may have compensable harm from the Unconstitutional Seperation of Powers Violation of the insulated FHFA Director Mel Watt.

Don't you think that the shareholders would be closer to R,R, and R BUT FOR the fact that Mel Watt UNCONSTITUTIONALLY lingered for over 1/2 of DJT's term?