Friday, February 03, 2023 3:41:58 AM
1.Cost for the consumer. It costs 600 down just to get started with Starlink. There are a lot of people who can't do that.
2. Speed fluctuations. I've seen several people report that Starlink has gotten worse over time and this backed up by Ookla speed tests.
3.Latency. Think about how long it takes for signal to reach a satellite in space. This is not acceptable for things that need low latency, think self-driving cars, autonomous tractors, remote surgery.
4.Congestion in space. I know some people write this one off, but there is only so much room up there and starlink uses premium satellite real-esate. It's just going to get more and more congested leading to slower and slower speeds.
5. Aradatum is not just about internet. Starlink just takes takes takes. Takes the materials for new satellites, they only last 5 years, takes the energy to send them into space, that doesn't sound environmentally friendly. Not only do Aradatum towers last significantly longer, power themselves, they actually produce excess power to create a secondary grid to alleviate the stress on our primary grid. Starlink could never!
Who would take a Starlink satellite over an Aradatum tower? Maybe Musk.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM