Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Gotham Bay Group]

This is not accurate. Review happens when an affected party requests a review or the commission decides on their own to review a decision.
In addition, in her decision, it clearly stated she recognized the noncompliance regarding the filings. But as an appointed judge she has the obligation as does the commission to rule in the best interests of shareholders. That is clearly stated in the regulations. These hearings are strictly designed for parties to put forth "extenuating circumstances" or errors in DOE recommendations. I can't see how the commission could have a vote of no confidence. As I said before, only reason DBMM is here today is they fought. Almost all others do not.


"She is a judge. Obviously no "expert" because she ruled directly against written regulation and solidly set precedent. This is the VERY REASON WHY her ruling is under review and will likely be either modified or overturned."