InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 73
Posts 6212
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2011

Re: JRoon71 post# 397784

Wednesday, 01/11/2023 8:34:38 PM

Wednesday, January 11, 2023 8:34:38 PM

Post# of 425850
Let’s do some basic Aristotelian logic.

Small companies with a one-drug pipeline and a finite patent runway have no unfair advantage over anyone to monetize the drug.

They have the projected cash flow off that runway. That’s it.

There is NO way a small company can monetize that runway anywhere near as efficiently as a Big Pharma company — they already have the apparatus to sell the drug and the expertise to maximize footprint as fast as possible. Margins simply go way up, and there are no mitigating variables.

This was probably the simplest analysis Sarissa ever performed. This company is worth $x on a DCF basis in its current, maximally inefficient configuration, and $2x simply having its single drug acquired.

There’s nothing AMRN can do on its own that a big company can’t do way better. That’s why Denner bought into this turd. That’s the obvious fact he saw.

"The biggest obstacles to our progress exist within our own lives in the form of cowardice and the tendency to give up. Breaking through these barriers will unleash a surging wave of change." -- Daisaku Ikeda

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News