InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 8513
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2016

Re: None

Saturday, 12/24/2022 10:44:38 AM

Saturday, December 24, 2022 10:44:38 AM

Post# of 700153
IMPLICATIONS FOR rGBM MHRA -FDA approval ?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170781455


OtherClinical Investigations (Human)
Distinguishing Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Using 18F-Fluciclovine PET
Ali Nabavizadeh, Stephen J Bagley, Robert K. Doot, Jeffrey B Ware, Anthony J. Young, Satyam Ghodasara, Chao Zhao, Hannah Anderson, Erin Schubert, Erica L. Carpenter, Jacob Till, Fraser Henderson, Austin R. Pantel, H. Isaac Chen, John Y. K. Lee, Nduka M. Amankulor, Donald M. O'Rourke, Arati Desai, MacLean P. Nasrallah and Steven Brem
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2022, jnumed.122.264812; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264812
Add to Cart ($15)
ArticleInfo & Metrics PDF
Abstract
Rationale: Accurate differentiation between tumor progression (TP) and pseudoprogression remains a critical unmet need in neuro-oncology. 18F-fluciclovine is a widely available synthetic amino acid PET radiotracer. In this study, we aimed to assess the value of 18F-fluciclovine PET for differentiating pseudoprogression from TP in a prospective cohort of patients with suspected radiographic recurrence of glioblastoma. Methods: We enrolled 30 glioblastoma patients with radiographic progression after first-line chemoradiotherapy who were planned for surgical resection. Patients underwent pre-operative 18F-fluciclovine PET and MRI. Relative percentages of viable tumor and therapy-related changes observed in histopathology were quantified and categorized as TP (=50% viable tumor), mixed TP (<50% and >10% viable tumor), or pseudoprogression (=10% viable tumor). Results: Eighteen patients had TP, 4 mixed TP, and 8 pseudoprogression. Patients with TP/mixed TP had significantly higher 40-50 minutes SUVmax (6.64+ 1.88 vs 4.11± 1.52, P = 0.009) compared to patients with pseudoprogression. A 40-50 minutes SUVmax cut-off of 4.66 provided 90% sensitivity and 83% specificity for differentiation of TP/mixed TP from pseudoprogression (Area under the curve (AUC)=0.86). Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBVmax) cut-off 3.672 provided 90% sensitivity and 71% specificity for differentiation of TP/mixed TP from Pseudoprogression (AUC=0.779). Combining a 40-50 minutes SUVmax cut-off of 4.66 and a rCBVmax cut-off of 3.67 on MRI provided 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity for differentiating TP/mixed TP from Pseudoprogression (AUC=0.95). Conclusion: 18F-fluciclovine PET uptake can accurately differentiate pseudoprogression from TP in glioblastoma, with even greater accuracy when combined with multi-parametric MRI. Given the wide availability of 18F-fluciclovine, larger, multicenter studies are warranted to determine whether amino acid PET with 18F-fluciclovine should be used in the routine assessment of post-treatment glioblastoma.

MRIOncology: BrainPET18F-fluciclovineGlioblastomaPseudoprogressionTumor progression
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI MEMBERS
SNMMI Member Login
Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

INDIVIDUALS
Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top
In this issue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 12
December 1, 2022
Table of Contents
Table of Contents (PDF)
About the Cover
Index by author
Complete Issue (PDF)

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share



Bookmark this article
Jump to section
Article
Info & Metrics
PDF

Related Articles
No related articles found.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cited By...
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Keywords
MRIOncology: BrainPET18F-fluciclovineGlioblastomaPseudoprogressionTumor progression
We recommend
18F-fluciclovine (FACBC) PET/CT in residual or recurrent gliomas
Trond Bogsrud, J Nucl Med, 2016
Correlating kinetic 18F-FDOPA uptake to quantitative MRI markers in primary and metastatic brain tumors to predict patient outcomes with hybrid PET/MRI
Mariam Aboian et al., J Nucl Med, 2018
18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Use in the Evaluation of Endometrial Cancer
Justin Lee et al., J Nucl Med, 2020
Combined 18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI Shows Potential for Detection and Characterization of High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Mattijs Elschot et al., J Nucl Med, 2018
FBPA PET/CT: to distinguish radiation necrosis from recurrent brain tumor
Rouaa Beshr et al., J Nucl Med, 2017
Validation of Deep Learning–based Augmentation for Reduced 18FFDG Dose for PET/MRI in Children and Young Adults with Lymphoma
Ashok J. Theruvath et al., Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2021
Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
Antonella Petrillo et al., Oncotarget, 2016
Diagnostic performance of 68 Gallium-PSMA-11 PET/CT to detect significant prostate cancer and comparison with 18 FEC PET/CT
Manuela A. Hoffmann et al., Oncotarget, 2017
Value of metabolic parameters in distinguishing primary mediastinal lymphomas from thymic epithelial tumors
Lei Zhu et al., Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2020
Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study
Brought to you by Pfizer Medical affairs
Powered by


SNMMI
© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News