InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 1840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2017

Re: allezlOM post# 270754

Sunday, 12/18/2022 8:20:43 AM

Sunday, December 18, 2022 8:20:43 AM

Post# of 348621

I appreciate you pulling up this readily available information.

In order for this to be relevant, you need to first establish a timeline of events. Secondly, establish who was trading during these times and why you chose 8 years for a time frame.

According to your post DBMM churned their entire float about twice a year annually on average, over the last 8 years. That is a very thinly traded stock my friend. Curiously, the 2 more significant trading numbers were obtained during the promoted pump and dump that occurred directly prior to the attempt at revocation.

I understand you are trying to make DBMM appear desirable by throwing up some click bait but anyone actually doing DD will see the elephant.

Just be honest in saying DBMM is a nothing company that had a horrible previous record for much longer than 8 years. They used the ticker as a public cash machine. Regardless of any culpability, they were the target of the toxic financing they received. Rightfully, DBMM was slated for the revocation process. Over the course of this, the assigned ALJ ruled in favor of dismissal. More surprisingly, DBMM became current and has remained so.
Regardless of anyone's perspective on DBMM or the if's, why's and who's, there is an excellent catalyst here. That is the only reason it is on any scanners or watch lists.