InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 102
Posts 19368
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/07/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 12/15/2022 11:42:58 AM

Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:42:58 AM

Post# of 9735
Looks like SDRC put out another vague PR touting high grades again. What do they mean by "average"assay? Average of what?? How many samples? And chemical assay. Why not fire assay? For higher grade material, fire assay is the way to go, not chemical analysis (AA).
Why so vague about the collected samples?
One sample result for 300' of a vein? That's complete BS. A channel sample every 5 or every 10 feet is the norm.
We’re they Grab or channel samples? If they were channels were they completely across the vein, and if so, what was the width sampled?
Where is the Report to document any of this? Where are the maps showing sample locations, geology, vein widths and orientations?
Why so much emphasis on hyping historical assay results? A lot of that historical assayed ore is mined and gone.
Focus on the now and drill.
Putting out a PR like this makes me question what’s really there, as if this stock doesn’t already get pumped enough by a crew on Twitter .
SDRC is starting to sound like every other penny mining stock.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SDRC/news/SIDNEY-RESOURCES-CORPORATION-RELEASES-CHEMICAL-ASSAY-AT-LUCKY-BEN-GOLD--SILVER-PROJECT?id=383267



Copying or duplication of any of this post is prohibited without expressed written consent of owner.