InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 83
Posts 17956
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/08/2008

Re: satter post# 239844

Monday, 12/05/2022 3:40:16 PM

Monday, December 05, 2022 3:40:16 PM

Post# of 241034
The benefit to Winning Brands shareholders of that 2011 valuation event is that today’s new GestureTek subsidiary, being created now, can be valued for financing purposes with an independent historical reference basis, rather than a subjective and speculative reference basis that has no precedent. The exceptionally high quality of the transaction partner who issued the news release shown above adds credence to the professionalism of the valuation factors that were applied at the time.

The new GestureTek subsidiary will, on the basis of an inevitably substantial valuation, be accepting a large dollar value minority investor infusion in order to stimulate GestureTek’s revitalization and growth. A portion of this infusion will flow through to Winning Brands as advance royalty payments under licensing from Winning Brands, as well as reimbursement to Winning Brands of certain early costs incurred, and will ultimately include profit sharing pari passu with other GestureTek stakeholders. This flow through will benefit Winning Brands creditors and shareholders, both.

Here you can see Eric has no clue what he is doing. He (Eric is saying this, NO BROKERGAE FIRM) is solely relying on numbers from the 2011 sales of GT's BEST ASSETS as to how he THINKS remains of the receivership GT will be valued.

Eric must think investors are completely naïve to believe whatever is left after the receivership will be worth anything remotely close to what was the peak of 2011 asset sale.

Anyone investing in this hornswoggle is going to be funding WNBD's little trips for the next few years, Vincent and Eric stand little, if ANY chance of getting the valuation they believe will happen.

What a complete FARCE.

“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”