InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 199
Posts 25119
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Emptyhead post# 539374

Sunday, 11/27/2022 7:26:36 PM

Sunday, November 27, 2022 7:26:36 PM

Post# of 726699
I won't claim to have calculated first hand, but shorts argue one thing and then another. One argument previously, was that they really had some absurd level of shares outstanding because their warrants were out ahead of their outstanding shares, and that that was one reason for some agreeing to delay their exercise.

I think some early estimates of that were outlandishly large, but the fact is, they need more shares to utilize fully their preferred c class and warrants, to some degree potentially. I'm not here to educate you on it, you need to do your own due diligence.

However, there are obvious reasons why a company needs shares to move from development stage to an operating company and people who vote against reasonable authorized shares to finance going forward, I believe, are obstructive and destructive participants in the company discussion and further development. Some for reasons that make little sense except in some false notion of "democracy". This is about avoiding liquidation and loss of one's shares by law, not democracy, and facilitating the continuing existence and development of the company and this opportunity. Then there are those who claim they are punitive or they need "more information", or whatever the latest claim is. I can't know their motivations, but I can evaluate the claims. Most are not reasonable at this stage in a company's lifecycle and make no sense.
Bullish
Bullish

I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News