Questions, if anyone can answer these, please feel free. I have but one post daily, so forgive me if I can not respond...appreciate any responses, I will read all.
First, now what happens to the class, as in class action? Do the current flyers they sent prior to the trial become null and void, and now the whole process of joining or staying out of the class starts over again? Will new flyers for the retrial go out?
Second, for those present at the trial, I am curious as to the jury make up, as in what were those women? All caucasian, half Asian, 2 were Hispanics? All over 30 years old or under, or all were 60+? Were they all dressed like house wives or were some dressed as professionals? A lot can be deduced from this information just as it was when the lawyers selected them.
Third, if indeed we can resubmit to being part of the class or not, does anyone here have a change of mind? Will you preserve your right to do a class action or sue yourself by staying out this time around? This is just curiosity on my part. Also, if Lamberth is reseated for the retrial, I don't think many have faith in his heavy hand on the scales of justice, so thinking there may be serious reconsiderations as to dropping from the class.
Fourth, would this be an opportune time to add the fannie shareholder class IF a different judge? Since much of Lamberth's denials were bull crap and many can be avoided now (hopefully, the P's lawyers are better schooled now). Was there ever proof to the statements that FNMA commons could not be added to the class because of their charter? Or was it because no one in the current class primary plantiffs owned FNMA? Different things have been stated, so I'm super curious if the FNMA commons can be added, or maybe they won't again?
Lastly, Does anyone think this is just another part of governments working with the judicial to delay as usual play for these donkeys? Is this part of their game plan? It seems as the delays pile up, that this is more and more of a conspiracy theorists dream. I'm sure I know where our friend Skeptic is on this. Lol
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
