InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 14164
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: pennypauly post# 263225

Monday, 11/07/2022 10:23:37 AM

Monday, November 07, 2022 10:23:37 AM

Post# of 349229
90% of these "19 BILLION" share numbers being quoted HAVE NOTHING TO DO with any type of "Naked Short" share position!!

The long held theory of a giant "Naked Short" position in DBMM has always always been associated with the uptick in trading numbers in the period of days AFTER the ASHER PR that cited the judge's ruling, giving Asher control of DBMM.

WHY are you including ANY of the shares before and AFTER that?????

These shares you list as being traded in 2014 (11 BILLION?)? What could they POSSIBLY have to do with any "naked shorting" supposedly done by Asher???

Those share in 2015 and 2016? The SAME!

In 2017? The Asher PR came out on May 3rd, 2017. In the few days after that, there were LOTS of shares traded. MANY would have been ACTUAL SELLS by shareholders, finally letting go of their DBMM "Dream"!

And as far as the millions of shares traded in the years after that? They have NOTHING to DO with any kind of "Naked short" scenario!

The numbers counted in your post? 90% of them MEAN NOTHING!!

I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.