InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 4249
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2020

Re: M I A post# 738502

Tuesday, 11/01/2022 9:29:21 PM

Tuesday, November 01, 2022 9:29:21 PM

Post# of 796620
But what if that one juror is wanting to award what is right? If mistrial, then maybe it gets a whole lot more interesting and more gets exposed. Devil is in the details... I honestly don't think any of those 8 women will be thrilled by being "talked down too" which I'm betting government lawyers did, and Lamberth, possibly. It seems H. Hume did a stellar job explaining in as close to layman's terms as you could get without insulting the jurors intelligence.

Also the judge is supposed to push the jury for a verdict up and until it becomes an unreasonable amount of time and those opposing just wont budge. They've sequestered jurors for full days in a row to puch a verdict out. I don't think this will get hung. There's too much fact that has been spilled. If any of those women are invested, which it is likely most are, then they will possibly take an ivestors position on this, which would not be well for the governments tangled web defense. If I was on this jury, I'd be wearing both my citizen hat that believes strictly in the constitution/rule of law, and my investor hat which believes in the rules and laws that apply to investor protections so we can invest in as fair as possible, markets driven by capitalism and NO OTHER "ism".

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”