Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[M I A]

If money only comes from FnF retained earnings and FHFA, who gave to themselves when giving FnF's $$ away to Treasury, isn't liable, then what the hell are we doing in Lamberth?

With such restrictions on damages and making us pay ourselves, possibly a tiny amount if at all, what will that do to end c-ship? How does it help get our stolen value back?
How does it help zero Lp of seniors? How does it help recap?

Share price will go up, which will mean money for us, when our balance sheets are green from written down Lp and full recap in sight. But how does Lamberth get us there?

Will we get true relief and justice, not from Lamberth, but as a result of what takes place in Lamberth court? From what evidence and testimony reveals to help us down the road in other litigation?

Let's say a couple of non win scenarios:
A win but no money awarded.
Or a win and tiny amount awarded to jp. Like 50 cents a share.
???????

That's crap. Forget the fact that I am 100% common. That's crap for jp as well. How could anyone be happy with that type of victory if that is all that comes from a win?

If this case with it's evidence and a win doesn't result in something meaningful, whether from Lamberth or as a result of Lamberth, then what was the point in unsealed documents? Hell, why seal them in the first place when they resulted in nothing? Something I am missing?

Please enlighten me. I'm looking for an answer from a shareholder perspective of FnF and not concerned about a bias toward jp or common. So please don't waste time on my common ownership.

I still believe I will win in the end. Just don't know exactly when and how.

Thanks for responses.

JMO