InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 14149
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: Poo28 post# 258869

Monday, 10/10/2022 7:37:19 PM

Monday, October 10, 2022 7:37:19 PM

Post# of 349073

It is a false narrative and was ordered silenced, no reference.

SCOTUS actually stated that the Company could bring in new evidence from the onset and the previous order could not be referenced in any legal context.



That is TOTAL BS!!

It was NEVER ordered “silenced”. It was simply remanded because of the impending LUCIA V. SEC decision. Remanded DOES NOT MEAN SILENCED or that no one can ever mention it again. It just means that the ruling has no effect. That’s been established and it’s ridiculous to keep stating that no one can ever mention a remanded ruling. It’s not true and that is well known.

As far as SCOTUS stating ANYTHING about DBMM? That is EQUALLY RIDICULOUS. SCOTUS hasn’t the faintest idea of ANYTHING involving little DBMM!


DBMM is a little pimple that has no significance- ANYWHERE.

I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.