Discussing how many shares Professor li has, be it one share or 500 million shares is a moot point. And has absolutely nothing to do with what li has done or will do for LQMT. Nor has it ever led to increasing contracts to consistently increase revenues and shareholder value. It’s a distraction.
Noting that the value of those shares have dropped more than 50% since li acquired them is also a moot point as well as noting the purchase price for those shares have dropped more than 70% in value are too moot points to support any opinions for what Professor li will do or will not do in the future with LQMT. Again, It’s a poor argument and is not supportive of any opinions that Professor li will be doing anything great for LQMT at any time.
Pointing to unverifiable data or verifiable data about any positive amorphous metal growth for six years now is also old news and Imho, rear view mirror thinking since not one theory of copy and waste articles have neither added one penny to LQMT’s bottom line nor caused LQMT to increase or decrease shareholder value by virtue of any contracts new or old.
I say it’s a poor argument because none of the factual data released in LQMT’s 10K’s or 10Q’s support that type of thinking. Nor does LQMT state that because a company in China may be successful at increasing revenues in China, that somehow that will trickle down to LQMT’s bottom line.
With all of the so called millions of parts produced for these so called mega cap whales for the past six years in China. Why is it that none of these parts manufactured have not yet ever entered into any of LQMT’s footprint around the globe for LQMT to receive any increase in revenues be it fees, royalties or direct sales?
There seems to be a lot of possible and plausible theories and hope for this type of revenue happening. But there does not seem to be an equal number of possible or plausible theories as to why it has not yet happened. Or how these parts never ever leave China’s footprints.
The only factual statements from LQMT supporting this hope are the agreements themselves between Li’s enterprise in China and Li’s enterprise in the USA. So far as I know and I don’t know much, it has not happened yet. Nor is there a time frame for it. Neither have any of these agreements caused or produced a contract for LQMT to increase shareholder value out of the red and into the green by way of consistency in reporting increased revenues.
Yes everyone in every investment in any stock hopes that what executives say will lead to increased growth. That’s nothing new. It’s been around before during and after the Great Depression. It’s old news. Hope in a company is old news along with expectations and hype. It’s not a strategy or substitute for confidence in an investment. If it is its a very poor one Imho and a poor substitute for real new contracts.
But without contracts and actual growth and increased communications, I guess repeated old news and copy and waste articles are the only hope left for LQMT’s future for some.
As for me. I’m more positive. I know LQMT will do it. They will succeed and this success will not be based on hope or theories, but on actual revenues received from actual contracts and exposure to fees and royalties. It’s the only way real success is attained. Not on hope and hype or pump and dump.
Yes individual profits can be made from copy and waste hype and pump and dump events. But not the profits I’m concluding.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Good luck to all operating LQMT to bring about it’s success.
Good luck to negotiating a contract.
