InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 20138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: Lowjack post# 69737

Thursday, 09/22/2022 11:48:32 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2022 11:48:32 PM

Post# of 86683
The gif example is explained in your last link in the following paragraph:

Skin Effect and Surface Currents

Magnetic fields cause eddy currents to flow in all conductor surfaces they impinge upon. With a sufficient depth of conductor, these eddy currents generate enough of their own magnetic field, that opposes the impinging field, partly reflecting it away from the conductor. The finite conductivity (non-zero resistivity) of the conductor causes these eddy currents to lose some energy as heat, governing the rate of absorption of the magnetic field as it penetrates the conductor.

How much depth into the conductor is required for good-enough magnetic field shielding depends on the skin depth in that type of conductor. For each skin depth further below the surface of the conductor, the eddy current density diminishes by 1/e, where e is “Eulers number,” approximately



Thanks for this because this better explains how the Cybertrucks exoskeleton absorbs the EM induced eddy currents. Its better to be absorbed in the exoskeleton than the ICs within the vehicle.
I'm still reading the article but it touches on thickness of the shielding material. The thicker it is the more the exoskeleton can absorb. Cybertrucks exoskeleton is 3mm thick and Starship is supposed to be 6mm thick. Obviously the radiation levels in upper atmosphere and space are significantly greater than on the surface.

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent TSLA News