InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 3291
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 09/22/2022 11:39:52 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2022 11:39:52 PM

Post# of 29980
JRL could you please explain the high significance of Llanos being a pigmy in the beginning regarding his testimony in C1912-2001 where he did not know CMN/Barrick.

Why was this significant at that time in order to make point as to why his claims were validated and overlaid Tesoros to Amerilos ?

He was a fixed plant by Lil / Emery to cause the original Amerilos to be canceled out in favor of identical UTM's on his Tesoros.

Has anyone in your extensive legal team ever done a chronological order on all the activites and the players involved?

In the latest questioning on your deposition, why was the claim and press release by CMN / Barrick that the properties being contested had no value nor bearing on their Pascua Lama project?
If that were the case it would certainly diminish any values to your claims as these were never measured?
As this rolls out that statement would be an utter lie on their part or am I completely wrong? Or did I miss something HUGE?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.