Tuesday, September 20, 2022 10:04:45 PM
His title, or lack thereof should not be what is looked at when calculating his worth.
I don't think we have enough information at this point to determine his worth, or lack thereof.
Has what he done, within legal parameters?
If no; it should stop here.
If yes, is what he is doing in the best interest of the proposed R/M, and if so,
is it being done for the benefit or expense of shareholders? ( don't mean is it temporally costing Shareholders money or equity. Is it negligent or intentional non-compliance)
We don't know until this plays out.
My view may be Pollyanna, but I don't see a problem here...yet.
.
DON'T PISS ON MY LEG AND TELL ME IT'S RAINING
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM