JRLopehandia any clarifications missed in your deposition re the following posted by poster on stockhouse and reflects much of this posters views
from stockhouse :
RE:JL Deposition Chapter 7
deposition questions.
I find after reading the whole of JRL’s deposition I have many questions that have not been adequately answered. I’m not sure MT if you have answers to some of my questions that precede 2010? Perhaps I’m not alone in wanting answers.
Does JRL really have some divine right of discovery of Amarillos Sur and Norte for the metallic rights, because of how Amarillos 1-3000 was registered by Barrick? ( this seems almost laughable! )Why was Villar allowed to sell these areas with Moreno’s if they were so important to JRL? If these areas were so important to JRL why did he rely on a handshake with John Lill only, and not get the agreement re surveying the properties in writing? What contractural agreement did JRL have with Villar? He always referred to Villar as his client…but Villar, according to Moreno, was his client. The Villar sale of these properties was never overturned in any court in Chile, so JRL’s claim must be false?
What are the names at the inception of C1912-2001, ( plaintiff and lawyer) ( I can only find Villar’s name on the list of litigants opposing CMN). JRL always says it was he who placed the injunction on the properties, but in the end he was found to be no part of C1912-2001?
Magistrate Reyes Kokisch in 2006….Her decision was apparently necessary for JRL to get the Vallenar Conservator of Mines to make a statement in JRL’s favor re ownership of the properties in question? Was her decisin only overturned for a legal technicality of how and when Barrick was notified? If it was only overturned for a legal technicality, why was the original premise of her judgement not supported by the Chilean Courts? Could this have been appealed by JRL, and if so, why was it not? When and on what date was Kokisch’s verdict overturned?
If JRL says Kokisch isn’t important, and JRL had some strange divine right as first discoverer…why has he never been able to prove this in a court of law in Chile? ( I know the answer to this must be his claim is false.)
JRL states it was not okay for Llanos to have had a verbal agreement between CMN in Chile to define his employee status. Here we are many years later, and he says it is good for him to have a verbal ongoing extension of the Option Agreement with MSX, not supported by clean titles. ( again…to leave him free of any responsibility to MSX shareholders or to escape a lawsuit or potential criminal prosecution? )
Is it becoming increasingly apparent to many…JRL has an ability to absolve himself of all quilt, ownership of actions, and activity that could be viewed as fraudulent, in order to twist the storyline to what he perceives benefits him? All the while is he hanging out to dry BJ/ MSX and possibly a few of his current and past lawyers?
Has the spider entangled himself in his own ever growing, deviously spun web? Such bluster, evasiveness, and over the top hyperbole full of crazy conspiracy theories, could not have won him any fans during his deposition.
I will await the the testimony of the other witnesses, and look forward to the ruling at the conclusion of this trial.
