JRL vs Claro Ossa:
Laura Phyllis María Emery is a criminal lawyer who, as Head of Barrick's legal department, sued the national judge María Isabel Reyes Kokisch with false testimonies in 2007 and 2010. In 2007 in civil matters, in a case in which Claro and Company defrauded me and the judge here in Canada by giving false information, because the judge, as I explained, was acquitted by the Supreme Court in 2008 saying that she had acted in her place and Claro y Compañía and Felipe Ossa came to say to Canada that the judge was practically a criminal entity, a swindler and that she had been sanctioned in the Court of Appeals and the trial had been removed and in 2010 another sentence was handed down.
The sentence of 2010 was stolen because if the Supreme Court in 2008 says "Call to hear sentence", the sentences are not reopened, but they reopened it in fraud, in bribery: they paid Villar's lawyer to let him be and they reopened the process but how did they reopen the 2010 process? Determining that Héctor Mardoqueo Unda Llanos is extraparte, he does not know CMN S.A., he does not know CMN Limitada, he does not know CMN SpA, he does not know Barrick, he has never met them; however, in 2012 in case 719 of 2011, as I find them without titles and the [treaties] of Minera Nevada, Limited and SpA, the judge calls them, tells him "The titles" "Your Honor, the titles do not exist" "What? What deal do you have with the incumbent?" "Your Honor, there is no written agreement with the owner" "What contract do you have with the owner?" "Your Honor, there is no contract" "And what do they have?" "A word agreement". In other words, that Felipe Ossa Guzmán invented evidence to come to authenticate a verbal agreement in Canada, that is the Barrick transaction that he came to put here. He came to tell Felipe Ossa that Barrick had bought Tesoros and owned Tesoros with CMN SpA.
He cuts it a little bit. Because the affidavit, or sworn statement, of Felipe Ossa was born on May 30, 2017 and Barrick with CMN SpA disposed of the concessions from Héctor Mardoqueo Unda Llanos
32
LOPEHANDIA c. CLARO AND CIA.
Treasures in 2018, one year later. As my father used to say "Don't lie or steal because the liar is caught super fast and the thief too" and what Barrick did was hire a liar to steal the titles of Mina Pascua Chile. Lama doesn't interest me because Lama is an Argentine hick, Lama is a binational scam, Lama is pedregales, Lama is the way in which the Barrick Gold Corporation swindled the Chilean system and the Chilean presidency by saying it was a binational project and it never was.
So, you have to be very careful in the form and substance in which Claro y Compañía acted in Chile in the first instance, in putting a totally false affidavit, only in English and depriving me of being able to know how this originated in Spanish, where The evidence came, what were the words in pure Spanish that were translated into champurreado English, because Felipe Ossa's affidavit is champurreado English that has no legal meaning. And I complain, I absolutely complain that the lawyer went to a notary public in Chile as a lawyer and that he notarized only in English and not in Spanish, and that he did not endorse the evidence that is being used in courts of law. In order for the Insurance Commission to use the evidence that Felipe Ossa produced and accuse me of being a criminal here today, in a factum that will be presented on September 22, in 15 more days or 17 more days. In that factum, Felipe Ossa appears as the expert lawyer in Chilean mining legislation who came to say that Barrick is the owner of the titles forever with the Nevada mining company in Chile.
In Canada they call it CBN, in Chile they call it Minera Nevada, but it turns out that h
